Simulating Humanity: from Generative Agents to 8 Billion Digital Twins — Joon Sung Park, Simile AI
Simile AI aims to simulate human society by creating 'digital twins' of populations, moving beyond current Large Language Model (LLM) capabilities. The core thesis is that predicting human behavior requires modeling underlying 'social physics' and causal mechanisms, not just pattern recognition from web data. The company's approach integrates three primary data types—qualitative interviews, observational/transactional data, and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)—to build highly accurate population and individual-level models. These simulations are intended to help solve 'wicked problems' like climate change and democratic instability by testing policies and interventions before real-world deployment.
Key takeaways
-
The Ambition: Simulating Society
2:00
The ultimate goal is to simulate the world to answer complex societal questions (e.g., climate change, democratic instability) that are difficult to solve in reality. This is framed as a move from prediction to understanding the path to a desired outcome, similar to Thomas Schelling's work on agent-based modeling.
-
Modeling Accuracy and Limitations
5:40
Simile claims to have created digital twins that reproduce human behavior and attitudes 85% as accurately as people reproduce their own responses. They argue that frontier LLMs are optimized to be 'super rational,' while human behavior is often irrational, requiring bespoke training on behavioral data.
-
The Necessity of Causal Data
7:28
To model human decision-making, the most critical data is not just what people say (attitudinal) or what they do (observational), but the data describing the *cause and mechanism* of their decisions, best acquired through Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).
-
Simulation vs. Prediction
10:00
Simulation's highest form is not answering 'what will happen' (prediction), but defining the necessary steps to reach a specific goal (e.g., 'What path must we take to keep unrest to 1,000 years?'). This allows for counterintuitive, yet optimal, interventions.
