AI Native Dev

We Scored a Real Snyk Skill Against Anthropic's Rules

Published 2026-08-05 · Duration 15:19

Summary

This video details a live review process where a Snyk skill (`SKILL.md`) was evaluated using Tessl's `tessl review run` against Anthropic's best practices. The initial score of 87% was successfully improved to 90% by applying fixes, demonstrating how automated tools can enhance skill quality and security. Key focus areas include implementing progressive disclosure to prevent context bloat, improving skill conciseness, and using Snyk's Agent Scan tool to detect vulnerabilities like prompt injection in both first-party and third-party skills.

Download summary

Key takeaways

  1. Skill Quality Improvement via Automated Review

    The review process successfully increased the skill score from 87% to 90% by applying fixes, demonstrating that automated tools can significantly improve adherence to best practices (e.g., Anthropic's guidelines).

  2. Importance of Progressive Disclosure 10:08

    Skills should not be overly dense or verbose. Implementing progressive disclosure—breaking large skills into smaller, referenced sub-files—prevents context bloat and ensures the agent only loads necessary information.

  3. Security Scanning with Agent Scan

    Snyk's dedicated tool, Agent Scan (available on GitHub), can scan skills for security vulnerabilities, including prompt injection, which is crucial when integrating third-party or user-written skills.

Technical details

  • Skill Evaluation Workflow 428s

    The process involves running `tessl review run` on a skill (e.g., Snyk API target configuration). This runs an agent review, treating the LLM as a judge against established best practices to score and suggest improvements for the `SKILL.md`.

  • Skill Standardization

    While many skills are initially personal, organizations can standardize them by having platform teams publish core skills (e.g., a skill for pushing to production) that must pass rigorous security and quality checks.

  • Skill Vulnerabilities

    Poorly written skills can introduce potential security issues, such as prompt injection. The review process helps identify these weaknesses in both first-party and third-party code.

Mentioned resources

Channel & topics

Watch on YouTube · Back to latest

This independent, AI-assisted summary is provided for commentary and informational purposes. It may contain errors or omit important context. Please watch the original video for the creator's complete presentation. Video, thumbnail, and related copyrights belong to their respective owners.